Ilbert Bill was introduced by Ilbert Bill. The Viceroy of Ripon’s administration in 1883 saw the introduction of the Sir Courtenay Pergine Ilbert-written Ilbert Bill, a piece of legislation. According to the law, Europeans could be tried by Indian courts. British citizens were exempt from being tried by Indian judges in 1873 prior to the bill’s introduction. Only a higher judge could adjudicate on instances involving death or transportation. With the introduction of the Ilbert Bill in 1883, this situation altered. This article has all the details related to Ilbert Bill for UPSC Exam Preparations.
Read More: Indian National Movement
Ilbert Bill Controversy
British and European citizens could be tried in session court by top Indian judges, according to the Ilbert Bill. Previously, only a British judge could preside over any cases involving a British person. This choice was made to relieve some of the pressure on British judges.
The Bill generated a great deal of controversy because of the pervasive racial ideology of the period. Additionally, because India was then a dominion of the British Crown, European and British settlers thought that the Bill was an insult to them and fiercely opposed it.
The European business community in Calcutta, which also included tea and indigo planters, fiercely opposed the legislation. Even covert backing came from a number of leaders. The argument’s basis was a set of deeply ingrained racial prejudices that were common at the time. Opponents of the legislation were greatly influenced by the advertising that implied Indian judges couldn’t be trusted to handle cases involving English women.
Read More: Indian Association of Calcutta
Ilbert Bill Resolution to the Conflict
The widespread public opposition to the law among the British populace, especially among women, forced Viceroy Ripon to approve an amendment in its new form in January 1884. A European, whether European or Indian, who was brought before a judge had the right to seek a jury trial with twelve members, at least seven of whom had to be Europeans or Americans, according to the modified Ilbert Bill. As a result, the revised measure lost the original’s spirit and usefulness.
The newly amended legislation was thus passed on January 25th, 1884, and it went into effect on May 1st of that same year, putting an end to the Ilbert Bill controversy. The updated Ilbert Bill led to the passage of the Criminal Process Code Amendment Act, 1884. The conflict between the Brits and Indians was made worse by the compromise and the discussion that followed.
Read More: East India Association
Ilbert Bill Controversy Aftermath
In addition to causing unrest among the British community in India, the Ilbert Bill also infuriated British officials, who harboured covert sympathies and backing because they did not like the idea of giving Indian judges the authority to try Europeans, who they believed to be better. English women resisted the Bill as well, claiming Bengali women should not have any say in matters involving English women because they were ignorant.
Bengali women who backed the Ilbert Bill disagreed with this assertion and argued that there were more educated Bengali women than educated English women. They also noticed that Indian women had more college degrees than British women did. Long before any British university, the University of Calcutta allowed female graduates to continue degree program in 1878.
Read More: Bombay Presidency Association
Ilbert Bill UPSC
Courtenay Peregrine Ilbert, who served as the Council of India’s law adviser, is honoured by the name Ilbert Bill. Viceroy Ripon, who truly wanted to remove racial prejudice from the Indian Penal Code, introduced the bill in 1883. In order to give Indian judges and magistrates the authority to try British offenders in criminal cases at the District level, Ripon had suggested amending the country’s existing laws. This article has all the details related to Ilbert Bill for UPSC Exam preparation.
Read More: Madras Mahajan Sabha