Home   »   Daily Current Affairs For UPSC 2025   »   Rights Against Climate Change

Rights Against Climate Change a Human Right

Context: In April 2024, the Supreme Court of India in the case of M.K. Ranjitsinh and Others vs Union of India recognized a human right against the adverse impacts of climate change.

More In News

  • The core issue involves protecting the Great Indian Bustard, an endangered bird, from adverse impacts of solar and wind energy projects.
  • The Court’s decision has been criticised for presenting decarbonization and biodiversity protection as adversarial, potentially prioritising the former over the latter.
  • The decision has sparked diverse reactions—some view it as a victory for climate action, while others criticise it for failing to protect endangered biodiversity.
  • The court in the final decision suggested adopting a “just transition.”

About Just Transition

  • Just transition aims to make climate action fair and inclusive, ensuring that the burdens and benefits of decarbonization are distributed equitably.
  • The concept began in the 1970s to protect workers affected by environmental regulations and was later incorporated into international climate agreements like the Paris Agreement in 2015.
  • Traditionally, it focuses on vulnerable human communities such as indigenous people, women, children, and minorities, but not on the non-human environment.

Advantages of a Just Transition Framing in the Case

  • Equitable and Inclusive Climate Action: The Court is encouraged to facilitate climate action that does not disproportionately impact any community.
    • Just transition allows for a more holistic approach, where the protection of biodiversity can coexist with decarbonization efforts.
  • Introducing Non-Human Entities: This case provides an opportunity to expand the scope of just transition to include the non-human environment, such as endangered species.
    • Drawing on eco-centric jurisprudence, the Court could recognize the rights of nature, thereby incorporating the non-human environment into the just transition framework.
  • Boosting Just Transition Litigation Research: The application of just transition in this case could spur research into just transition litigation, particularly in the context of renewable energy projects in India.
    • It could help map out and recognize just transition cases that are currently overlooked or not categorised as such in existing databases.

Implications for Future Climate Litigation

  • Global Context: As countries strive for net-zero emissions, just transition litigation is expected to rise.
    • In India, there are currently 20 ongoing disputes related to renewable energy projects, many of which involve equitable sharing of decarbonization burdens and benefits.
  • Legal and Litigation Framework: Adoption of just transition could guide future climate litigation, ensuring that climate action is both fair and effective.
  • Renewable Energy Projects: The case is not an anti-energy transition but aims to ensure responsible and informed operation of renewable energy projects, potentially influencing how power transmission lines and other infrastructural elements are implemented.
  • Research and Policy Development: Could catalyse necessary research and policy adjustments to better understand and implement just transition principles in climate law and litigation.

Sharing is caring!

About the Author

Sakshi Gupta is a content writer to empower students aiming for UPSC, PSC, and other competitive exams. Her objective is to provide clear, concise, and informative content that caters to your exam preparation needs. She has over five years of work experience in Ed-tech sector. She strive to make her content not only informative but also engaging, keeping you motivated throughout your journey!