Table of Contents
Context: The 2025 NATO summit in The Hague is portrayed as a critical moment, with NATO’s relevance and cohesion being questioned due to persistent transatlantic tensions, the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and Trump’s scepticism about the alliance.
| About NATO |
|
Why Eurasian Powers Must Find Political Answers to Security Problems
- Changing US Commitments: As the US questions its role in defending Europe and the Middle East, traditional reliance on American military support is no longer assured.
- Limits of Military Spending: Raising defence budgets (now 5% of their GDP) on defence alone cannot address complex security dilemmas rooted in regional rivalries, historical grievances, and shifting alliances (such as Russian aggression in Ukraine or the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict.)
- Geopolitical Shifts: The Russian invasion of Ukraine and realignments in the Middle East highlight the need for homegrown political solutions, including dialogue and regional cooperation.
- Strategic Autonomy: Germany’s “Zeitenwende” policy is transforming it into a security provider for Europe, rather than relying solely on US protection.
- In Asia, Japan has begun revising its pacifist constitution to enable a more active defence role, and India has invested in its own defence industry and security partnerships beyond the US, such as with France and the Quad (Japan, Australia, US, India).
| Key Features of the Zeitenwende Policy |
|
- Regional Reconciliation: Efforts like the normalization of ties between Saudi Arabia and Iran—facilitated by China—demonstrate the power of political negotiation in reducing tensions, even where military confrontation has failed for decades.
- In Central Asia, countries like Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan are building regional security and economic partnerships to reduce dependence on outside powers.
- Birth of a New Order: The rise of China, renewed Russian assertiveness, a more independent Europe, and India’s growing global profile signal a shift to a multipolar world.
- This demands coalitions (like BRICS or the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation) and new diplomatic approaches, rather than relying solely on the old US-centric alliances or military pacts.
Implications for India
- India’s unique geography and strategic position, straddling Europe, the Middle East, and the Indo-Pacific, offer both challenges and opportunities.
- India is actively:
- Deepening strategic ties with Europe.
- Engaging all major actors in the Middle East.
- Stabilizing ties with China and bolstering relations with ASEAN, Australia, Japan, and South Korea.
- Maintaining robust engagement with the US, regardless of its inward turn.
- These moves are aimed at ensuring India’s ability to navigate a world of “diminished certainties” and maximize its strategic autonomy.


Iran Nuclear Crisis and India’s Role f...
H1B Visa Program, Beneficiaries, Eligibi...
Comparison Between India & France's ...













