Table of Contents
Context
- A recent study scrutinised over 500 emissions scenarios from the IPCC’s reports, uncovering persistent disparities.
- Despite global efforts, developed nations are projected to maintain higher income, energy use, and emissions rates compared to their developing counterparts until 2050.
About IPCC Assessment Reports
- What are they?
- Comprehensive reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
- Assess climate-related scientific literature.
- Capture the state of knowledge on climate change (science, technology, socio-economics).
- Structure of Reports:
- Three Working Group Reports:
- Physical Science – climate system and climate change.
- Climate Adaptation – impacts, vulnerability, and adaptation strategies.
- Mitigation Action – reducing greenhouse gas emissions and limiting warming.
- Synthesis Report – consolidates findings from the Working Groups.
- Thematic Special Reports – address specific climate change aspects.
- Three Working Group Reports:
- Current Stage: IPCC is currently in its Seventh Assessment Cycle (AR7).
We’re now on WhatsApp. Click to Join
How IPCC Assesses Future Scenarios?
- Method: Uses “modelled pathways” to estimate actions needed to limit global warming.
- Tools: Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) that combine human and earth systems.
- Consider various aspects:
- Macroeconomic models – project future economic growth (GDP).
- Energy models – project future energy consumption.
- Vegetation models – examine land-use changes.
- Earth-system models – understand how climate evolves based on physics.
- Consider various aspects:
- Goal: Provide policy-relevant guidelines on climate action.
Shortcomings of Current Models
- Focus on Least:
- Cost Solutions: Prioritizes cost-effectiveness, not equity. (e.g., setting up solar plants might be cheaper in India than the US).
- Ignores Equity Considerations:
- Doesn’t account for the historical responsibility of developed countries for high emissions.
- Doesn’t consider the future energy needs of developing countries for development.
New Study Findings on IPCC Scenarios (AR6)
- Analysis: 556 future emissions scenarios from IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report (AR6).
- Findings:
- Disparity between developed and developing countries persists: Income, energy use, and emissions disparities between developed and developing countries persist until 2050.
- Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and most of Asia (60% of the global population) will have lower GDP per capita than the global average even in 2050.
- Similar inequities exist in the consumption of goods and services, energy, and fossil fuels between developed and developing countries.
- Unequal burden of mitigation: Developing countries are projected to take on a higher burden of:
- Land-based carbon sequestration (e.g., forests).
- Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technologies.
- Disregards historical responsibility: Developed countries have emitted more historically
- Ignores development needs of the Global South: Poorer countries may need more energy for development
- Disparity between developed and developing countries persists: Income, energy use, and emissions disparities between developed and developing countries persist until 2050.
Why Equity Matters in Climate Action?
- UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC):
- Principle of Equity: tackling climate change requires a fair approach.
- Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities: richer countries have a greater responsibility due to historical emissions. (Article 3 of UNFCCC)
- Current Mitigation Pathways:
- Modelled using IAMs, often disregard equity principles.
- Focus on global technical and economic feasibility, not fairness.
- Developed countries need to take the lead in reducing emissions and make resources available to developing countries.

World Summit on Disaster Management (WSD...
Domestic Systemically Important Banks (D...
The Missing Link in India’s Critical M...













