Regulatory Issues in India’s Nuclear Programme

Context: The Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR) at Kalpakkam achieved first criticality, but the milestone has also revived debate over India’s nuclear regulatory framework.

Regulatory Issues in India’s Nuclear Programme

• Institutional Conflict: Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) and Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) both report to the Atomic Energy Commission, creating promoter–regulator overlap.
• Project Delays & Cost Overruns: Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR) faced long delays (~16 years) and cost escalation (sanctioned ₹3,500 crore but final cost is  ~₹8,181 crore), indicating weak regulatory and project monitoring.
• Limited Transparency: India’s nuclear programme operates with high institutional insulation, reducing external scrutiny of timelines, safety practices, and cost management.
• Weak Independent Safety Oversight: Unlike global best practices, India lacks a fully independent statutory nuclear safety regulator comparable to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
• Complex Fuel Cycle Regulation: Breeder reactors require reprocessing, plutonium handling, and closed fuel-cycle management, which demand more sophisticated regulatory frameworks.
• Emerging Technological Challenges: New developments (Small Modular Reactors, private participation, advanced reactors) increase regulatory complexity.

Way Forward

• Establish an Independent Nuclear Regulator: Create a statutory independent nuclear safety authority (similar to the proposed Nuclear Safety Regulatory Authority) separate from the DAE.
• Strengthen Transparency and Accountability: Introduce parliamentary oversight, public reporting of safety audits, and independent technical reviews.
• Improve Project Governance: Adopt better procurement practices, project management systems, and cost monitoring to prevent delays.
• Modernise Regulatory Framework: Update regulations to cover breeder reactors, advanced reactors, SMRs, and private sector participation under the SHANTI Act (2025).
• Strengthen Safety Culture: Enhance independent safety audits, leak detection protocols, and emergency preparedness for complex reactors such as FBRs.
• Align Nuclear Strategy with Energy Economics: Ensure nuclear investments remain cost-effective compared to renewable energy options, while supporting energy security and net-zero goals (2070).

Sharing is caring!