Context: The SC Collegium recommended a new Chief Justice for 5 High Courts: Madhya Pradesh, Karnataka, Gauhati, Patna, and Jharkhand.
Appointment of High Court Judges
- Article 217: Every Judge of a High Court shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal.
- This is done after consultation with the Chief Justice of India (CJI), the Governor of the State and the Chief Justice of the High Court.
- Qualifications: (Article-217)
- Citizens of India
- He/she should have held Judicial office for at least 10 years.
- They should have for at least 10 years been an advocate of a High Court.
Constitutional Provisions |
- Article 217: Governs the appointment of High Court judges, including the Chief Justice (CJ).
- Article 222: Allows the transfer of judges (including CJs) from one High Court to another.
|
Appointment Process of High Court Chief Justice
- Recommendation by Collegium: The Supreme Court Collegium (headed by the CJI and comprising 4 senior-most SC judges) recommends names for the Chief Justice of a High Court.
- Seniority, merit, and regional representation are key considerations.
- Central Government’s Role: The Union Ministry of Law forwards the Collegium’s recommendation to the Prime Minister.
- The PM advises the President on formal appointments.
- The government can seek clarification cannot reject the Collegium’s recommendation indefinitely.
- Oath & Tenure: The appointed CJ takes oath under Article 219.
- Retires at 62 years(Article 217(1)).
Fact |
- The original constitution provided 60 years as the retirement age for HC judges.
- The 15th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1963, raised the retirement age of HC judges from 60 years to 62 years.
- The President appoints an HC Judge, but the Governor administers his oath.
|
Procedure of Appointment of HC Judges
- Initiation: The proposals of names for appointment as a judge in the High Court are initiated by the Chief Justice of the concerned High Court.
- High Court Collegium:
- The Chief Justice of the High Court consults the two senior-most judges of the High Court before proposing such names.
- Scrutiny by Government:
- Recommendations of the HC Collegium are sent to the Governor, Chief Minister and the CJI.
- The Governor, based on the advice of the Chief Minister, sends the proposal to the Minister of Law and Justice at the Centre.
- The Union Law Ministry conducts a background check and sends the recommendation to the CJI to consider it with the rest of the SC collegium.
Supreme Court Collegium
- Composition of collegium: It consists of the CJI and two senior-most judges of the Supreme Court.
- Decision of collegium: The Supreme Court collegium then considers such names recommended by the High Court collegium.
- SC collegium has the power to reject the names recommended by the High Court collegium.
- Decision of the Union government:
- After due deliberations on such names, the Union Cabinet advises the President to appoint such persons as judges in the High Court.
Key Points
- Collegium System: Evolved from the Three Judges Cases(1981, 1993, 1998), it is a judicial precedent, not mentioned in the Constitution.
- Difference from CJI Appointment: CJI is appointed solely by seniority, while HC CJs are appointed based on Collegium recommendations.
- Controversies: Lack of transparency, delays in appointments, and government-judiciary tussles.
Did You Know? |
- The strength of the HC judges is determined by the President, whereas in the case of the SC, it is determined by Parliament.
- Unlike the Supreme Court, there is no provision for the appointment of a distinguished jurist as a High Court judge.
|
Sharing is caring!