Speedy Justice and the Crisis in Consumer Courts

Speedy justice is the cornerstone of consumer protection in India. Consumer courts were created to provide simple, affordable, and time-bound remedies to ordinary citizens against powerful corporations, insurers, service providers, and manufacturers. However, ground realities reveal a growing crisis in consumer courts, where prolonged delays, repeated adjournments, and structural weaknesses are eroding public faith in the justice delivery system.

Despite statutory timelines under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, lakhs of consumers remain trapped in litigation that stretches over years—often defeating the very purpose of consumer justice.

The Promise of Speedy Justice in Consumer Law

Consumer courts in India were designed as quasi-judicial forums to ensure:

• Quick disposal of cases

• Minimal procedural complexity

• Low litigation costs

• Accessibility without mandatory legal representation

The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 reinforces this objective by mandating:

• 3 months for disposal of cases where no testing is required

• 5 months where laboratory analysis or expert examination is necessary

• Restriction on unnecessary adjournments

In theory, consumer justice is meant to be swift and citizen-friendly. In practice, it has become a test of patience and endurance.

Mounting Backlog: The Scale of the Crisis

The magnitude of delay in consumer courts is alarming.

• As of January 30, 2024, over 5.43 lakh consumer complaints were pending across District, State, and National Consumer Commissions.

• In 2024, new filings exceeded disposals, leading to a net increase of nearly 15,000 cases.

• The trend continued in 2025, with disposals lagging behind fresh filings.

This persistent backlog reflects a system struggling to keep pace with rising consumer awareness and litigation.

Human Cost of Delayed Consumer Justice

Behind these numbers lie thousands of personal tragedies.

Consumers are often required to:

• Travel long distances for hearings

• Bear repeated costs of travel, accommodation, and lost workdays

• Face uncertainty as cases are adjourned by months

For small entrepreneurs, retirees, and salaried individuals, delayed justice translates into financial ruin, mental stress, and loss of livelihood. In many cases, consumers become loan defaulters or abandon litigation altogether due to exhaustion.

Justice delayed in consumer courts often becomes justice denied.

Structural Bottlenecks in Consumer Courts

1. Acute Staff Shortages

One of the biggest contributors to delay is vacancy in key positions.

• As of August 2025:

  • 18 President posts and 62 Member posts were vacant at State Commissions

  • 218 President posts and 518 Member posts were vacant at District Commissions

These vacancies have increased sharply compared to 2024, indicating systemic neglect.

With fewer benches handling thousands of cases, adjournments become inevitable.

2. Infrastructure and Resource Constraints

Many consumer courts operate with:

• Limited courtrooms

• Inadequate administrative staff

• Poor digital infrastructure

• Inefficient case listing and tracking systems

In several districts, consumer courts function from shared or temporary premises, further hampering efficiency.

3. Lack of Subject-Matter Expertise

Modern consumer disputes are increasingly complex, involving:

• Medical negligence

• Insurance and reinsurance claims

• Financial products and banking services

• Cross-border e-commerce and digital fraud

While many Members are legally trained, they often lack technical or sectoral expertise, leading to:

• Frequent calls for expert opinions

• Laboratory testing delays

• Repeated adjournments

Without specialised benches or continuous training, complex cases move far slower than envisioned by law.

4. Procedural Delays and Tactical Adjournments

Consumer courts also suffer from:

• Non-service of notices

• Delayed filing of affidavits

• Requests for additional evidence

• Strategic adjournments by opposite parties

In many cases, well-resourced corporations use delay as a litigation strategy to wear down consumers financially and psychologically.

Digitalisation: Promise vs Reality

The e-Daakhil portal was introduced to simplify filing and reduce physical appearances. While it has improved accessibility, challenges remain:

• Limited digital literacy among litigants

• Hybrid hearings not uniformly implemented

• Physical presence still required in higher forums

• Case listings still skewed, with lower-numbered cases consuming most court time

Digital reform without institutional strengthening has delivered partial relief at best.

Why Speedy Justice Matters in Consumer Courts

Delays in consumer justice have broader implications:

• Erosion of trust in rule of law

• Weakening of consumer rights enforcement

• Encouragement of unfair trade practices

• Increased burden on higher judiciary due to appeals

When consumer courts fail, citizens are pushed toward civil courts, worsening overall judicial pendency.

Way Forward: Reforming Consumer Courts

To restore faith in consumer justice, India needs urgent, multi-pronged reforms.

1. Time-Bound Appointments

• Fast-track filling of vacancies

• Transparent and merit-based selection processes

2. Infrastructure Upgrade

• Dedicated court complexes

• Adequate administrative staff

• Robust digital case management systems

3. Specialised Benches & Training

• Sector-specific benches for complex disputes

• Regular training for Members on emerging consumer issues

4. Stricter Control on Adjournments

• Penal costs for frivolous delays

• Mandatory reasons for adjournments, as per statute

5. Greater Use of Virtual Hearings

• Reduce travel burden for litigants

• Ensure hybrid hearings, especially at national level

Conclusion

Consumer courts were envisioned as people’s courts, delivering quick and affordable justice. Today, mounting backlogs, staff shortages, and procedural delays threaten this vision. Speedy justice is not a privilege—it is a statutory and constitutional necessity.

Unless systemic reforms are undertaken urgently, consumer courts risk becoming yet another overburdened judicial forum, undermining the very idea of consumer empowerment in India.

Ensuring timely justice in consumer disputes is not just about resolving cases—it is about protecting dignity, livelihoods, and trust in democratic institutions.

Sharing is caring!