Regulatory Framework for AI in Healthcare: Complete Guide, Laws, Ethics

Context

• India has developed a framework called Strategy for Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare for India (SAHI) for using AI in healthcare.

More about the Framework

• It is built by Union Health Ministry and the National Health Authority (NHA)
• It builds on the digital public infrastructure created under the Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM)
• India becomes one of the first Southeast Asian countries with a comprehensive AI-health strategy.
• Model for Global South: India’s digital public infrastructure-based AI governance offers a scalable template for developing nations.

Key Features of the Guidelines (SAHI)

• Data Collection and Curation: High-quality, diverse and ethically sourced data must be collected carefully to prevent bias and ensure reliable training of AI systems.
• Model Training and Validation: AI models must be scientifically validated through rigorous testing to ensure accuracy, fairness and safety before deployment in real healthcare settings.
• Deployment and Integration: AI systems must integrate smoothly into hospital workflows without disrupting existing medical practices or overburdening healthcare professionals.
• Continuous Monitoring: AI tools must be regularly monitored after deployment to detect performance decline, bias or unexpected outcomes in real-world use.
• Decommissioning if Needed: If an AI system becomes unsafe, outdated or ineffective, there must be mechanisms to withdraw or replace it responsibly.
• Privacy-by-Design & Consent Architecture: It follows ABDM principles, ensuring patient consent, minimal data sharing, secure APIs, and complete transparency in how data is used.
• Federated Data Model: Health data remains stored at hospitals and labs, reducing risks of centralised breaches while allowing controlled data exchange when consent is given.
• Patient Consent Mechanism: Patients must explicitly approve sharing of their health data, and they can revoke consent at any time, strengthening data ownership rights.
• Standardised Evaluation Criteria: AI tools must meet defined technical and clinical standards before being approved for public healthcare procurement.
• Outcome-Based Purchasing: Payment models may link AI performance to measurable health outcomes rather than upfront technology costs
• Bias Assessment: AI must be tested across genders, rural populations and marginalised groups to avoid discriminatory outcomes.
• Periodic Re-certification: AI systems should undergo periodic re-evaluation to ensure safety as they evolve with new data.
• Benchmarking Open Data Platform for Health AI (BODH): BODH provides curated datasets to test and compare AI models fairly while protecting sensitive health data through secure access mechanisms.

Why This Framework Was Needed

• Fragmented and Sensitive Health Data: India’s health data is scattered and sensitive. Without proper governance, AI deployment could worsen inequality or compromise privacy.
• Risk of Algorithmic Bias: AI trained on limited datasets may underperform for rural, female or marginalised populations, leading to unequal healthcare delivery.
• Safety & Clinical Accountability:AI systems directly influence diagnosis and treatment. Errors may cause serious harm, requiring strict validation and oversight mechanisms.
• Regulatory Vacuum: Existing medical regulations do not fully cover adaptive AI systems. The framework fills this policy gap.
• Procurement Uncertainty:Hospitals lacked clear mechanisms to evaluate and purchase AI tools, slowing responsible adoption.

Major Concerns and Challenges

• Data Privacy & Security Risks:Health data breaches can damage public trust and expose individuals to discrimination, making cybersecurity safeguards essential.
• Model Drift: AI systems may change performance over time as new data is added, requiring regular monitoring and recalibration.
• Over-Reliance on Technology: Doctors must remain decision-makers, ensuring AI assists rather than replaces human clinical judgment.
• Digital Divide: Rural hospitals may lack infrastructure and trained staff, limiting equitable AI deployment.
• Ethical and Legal Liability:Clear responsibility must be defined when AI-related errors occur in medical practice.

Way Forward

• Strengthen Regulatory Oversight:India may establish a dedicated AI-health regulatory cell to monitor compliance and enforce periodic safety reviews.
• Expand Federated Learning:Federated learning can allow AI training without moving raw data, improving privacy protection.
• Promote Public-Private Collaboration:Partnerships between government, academia and startups can accelerate innovation while ensuring accountability.
• Bridge the Digital Divide:Investment in rural digital infrastructure and low-bandwidth AI tools will ensure equitable healthcare access.
• Continuous Dataset Updating:BODH datasets must be regularly updated and diversified to prevent stagnation and bias.
• Clear Legal Framework:Clear laws on liability, transparency and grievance redressal will strengthen trust in AI systems.

Sharing is caring!