Home   »   Militarisation of Quantum Research
Top Performing

Militarisation of Quantum Research and Global Tech Arms Race

Context

  • A group calling itself “Quantum Scientists for Disarmament” has issued a manifesto opposing the growing militarisation of quantum research, urging academics to reject defence funding and demand transparency in university–military partnerships.

Why the Manifesto Now?

  • Global Rearmament Trends: NATO’s 2024 quantum strategy and similar initiatives in the EU, U.S., and China frame quantum research as part of emerging and disruptive technologies critical to national security.
  • India’s Defence Integration: In January 2026, India’s Chief of Defence Staff unveiled a Military Quantum Mission Policy Framework aligning defence R&D with national quantum capabilities under the National Quantum Mission.

The manifesto positions itself as a response to these developments, arguing that defence patronage risks reshaping research priorities.

Why Quantum Science Is Strategically Sensitive

  • Quantum Computing: Quantum computers could break current cryptographic systems, potentially undermining military communications and global financial security.
  • Quantum Communication: Quantum key distribution (QKD) promises theoretically unhackable communication networks—valuable for defence and intelligence.
  • Quantum Sensors: High-precision quantum sensors can enhance submarine detection, drone navigation, missile tracking and GPS-denied operations.
  • Timing and Navigation: Atomic clocks and quantum timing systems enable resilient navigation systems independent of satellite signals—strategically critical in warfare.

These capabilities explain why defence establishments prioritise quantum research.

What the Manifesto Demands

  • Collective Opposition to Military Use: Researchers call for public resistance to military applications of quantum science and advocacy for peaceful research norms.
  • Transparency in Funding: The group proposes a public database listing defence-funded quantum projects in universities to expose hidden or indirect funding streams.
  • Ethics Debate Within Academia: They seek institutional forums to debate the moral implications of dual-use research and to encourage ethical guidelines.
  • Rejection of Military Funding: The manifesto urges academics to decline defence grants, arguing that such funding structurally biases research agendas.

Militarisation of Quantum Research

Arguments Against Militarisation Counterarguments
Agenda Distortion – Defence funding may skew research priorities away from civilian science. Dual-Use Reality – Quantum tech is inherently dual-use; separation is impractical.
Arms Race Risk – Military quantum applications may intensify geopolitical rivalry. National Security Need – States must develop capabilities to deter adversaries.
Opaque Funding – Hidden defence links reduce transparency and accountability. Regulation Over Rejection – Better oversight is preferable to cutting defence ties.
Soft Power Influence – Defence funding may create dependency in Global South institutions. Strategic Autonomy – Indigenous quantum defence boosts technological sovereignty.
Ethical Responsibility – Scientists should avoid contributing to warfare. Innovation Spillovers – Defence R&D often produces major civilian benefits.



Sharing is caring!

[banner_management slug=militarisation-of-quantum-research]