Table of Contents
Context
- A group calling itself “Quantum Scientists for Disarmament” has issued a manifesto opposing the growing militarisation of quantum research, urging academics to reject defence funding and demand transparency in university–military partnerships.
Why the Manifesto Now?
- Global Rearmament Trends: NATO’s 2024 quantum strategy and similar initiatives in the EU, U.S., and China frame quantum research as part of emerging and disruptive technologies critical to national security.
- India’s Defence Integration: In January 2026, India’s Chief of Defence Staff unveiled a Military Quantum Mission Policy Framework aligning defence R&D with national quantum capabilities under the National Quantum Mission.
The manifesto positions itself as a response to these developments, arguing that defence patronage risks reshaping research priorities.
Why Quantum Science Is Strategically Sensitive
- Quantum Computing: Quantum computers could break current cryptographic systems, potentially undermining military communications and global financial security.
- Quantum Communication: Quantum key distribution (QKD) promises theoretically unhackable communication networks—valuable for defence and intelligence.
- Quantum Sensors: High-precision quantum sensors can enhance submarine detection, drone navigation, missile tracking and GPS-denied operations.
- Timing and Navigation: Atomic clocks and quantum timing systems enable resilient navigation systems independent of satellite signals—strategically critical in warfare.
These capabilities explain why defence establishments prioritise quantum research.
What the Manifesto Demands
- Collective Opposition to Military Use: Researchers call for public resistance to military applications of quantum science and advocacy for peaceful research norms.
- Transparency in Funding: The group proposes a public database listing defence-funded quantum projects in universities to expose hidden or indirect funding streams.
- Ethics Debate Within Academia: They seek institutional forums to debate the moral implications of dual-use research and to encourage ethical guidelines.
- Rejection of Military Funding: The manifesto urges academics to decline defence grants, arguing that such funding structurally biases research agendas.
Militarisation of Quantum Research
| Arguments Against Militarisation | Counterarguments |
| Agenda Distortion – Defence funding may skew research priorities away from civilian science. | Dual-Use Reality – Quantum tech is inherently dual-use; separation is impractical. |
| Arms Race Risk – Military quantum applications may intensify geopolitical rivalry. | National Security Need – States must develop capabilities to deter adversaries. |
| Opaque Funding – Hidden defence links reduce transparency and accountability. | Regulation Over Rejection – Better oversight is preferable to cutting defence ties. |
| Soft Power Influence – Defence funding may create dependency in Global South institutions. | Strategic Autonomy – Indigenous quantum defence boosts technological sovereignty. |
| Ethical Responsibility – Scientists should avoid contributing to warfare. | Innovation Spillovers – Defence R&D often produces major civilian benefits. |
Read More Notes Explore StudyIQ Courses
Environment Notes
Art and Culture Notes
Science and Tech
History Notes
Geography Notes
Indian Polity Notes
General Knowledge
International Relation

Freedom of Speech and Parliamentary Priv...
Proteins as Quantum Sensors: New Advance...
Illegal Use of Satellite Phones: Securit...








